Blog

I. Introduction: What is ICE, Anyway? You see "ICE" splashed across headlines, a stark acronym evoking strong reactions. But do you really know who they are and what they *do*? Let's peel back the layers of this agency that has become a lightning rod in the American landscape. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement – often confused with Border Patrol – is the federal agency charged with enforcing immigration laws *inside* the country. Their work involves the arresting, detaining, and, ultimately, deporting individuals living within our borders without authorization. Their actions are no longer whispers in the shadows; they're sparking nationwide protests, igniting fierce legal battles, and forcing us to confront fundamental questions about who we are as a nation. II. A Look Back: Where Did This Agency Come From? ICE wasn't always a household name. Its genesis lies in the aftermath of 9/11. Born in 2003, it was a direct response to the perceived vulnerabilities exposed on that fateful day, consolidating elements of the old Customs Service and the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS). To truly understand ICE, though, we must zoom out and consider the broader tapestry of US immigration enforcement history.We began, in many ways, with relatively open doors, a reflection of a burgeoning nation hungry for labor and populated by immigrants. This openness began to close, however, with early federal controls like the Chinese Exclusion Act. The 20th century witnessed the rise of formal enforcement mechanisms: the establishment of the Border Patrol, the imposition of national origin quotas, and the implementation of mass expulsion programs like "Operation Wetback." The post-1965 reforms brought their own complexities, and increased enforcement measures under Presidents Reagan, Clinton, and Obama gradually set the stage for the agency and the policies we grapple with today. Each era has left its mark, shaping the legal and social landscape within which ICE operates. III. The Trump Era, Redux: An Unprecedented Surge President Trump's return to office brought with it a renewed promise: the "Largest Mass Deportation Effort" this nation has ever seen. And the numbers, as they say, don't lie. In the first five months of his second term, ICE arrests surged by a staggering 120% compared to the same period in 2024. The Biden administration's more focused enforcement priorities were swiftly reversed, and the net was broadened to encompass a far wider range of individuals, including those without criminal records or with only minor offenses.The impact isn't uniform. Arrests are heavily concentrated in border and Southern states, with Texas accounting for nearly a quarter of all ICE arrests. Florida and California also bear a significant burden. While ICE consistently emphasizes its focus on "criminal illegal aliens," recent data paints a more nuanced and troubling picture: a significant portion of those detained have no criminal convictions at all. Are we truly targeting the "worst of the worst," or are we casting too wide a net, ensnaring individuals who pose no real threat to public safety? IV. Echoes in the Streets: A Wave of Protests The intensified ICE operations haven't gone unnoticed. From Los Angeles to New York City, from St. Louis to countless other communities, demonstrations have erupted in response. What ignited this fury? A confluence of factors: highly visible ICE raids leading to mass arrests, growing public concern over reported inhumane conditions in detention centers, and the overall tenor of Trump's aggressive deportation push.Los Angeles, a city built by immigrants, has found itself on the front lines, with protests escalating into violent clashes and vandalism. The controversial deployment of National Guard troops and even Marines – despite objections from Governor Newsom – speaks volumes about the tensions simmering beneath the surface. In New York, we've seen sit-ins at Trump Tower, impassioned protests outside federal immigration courts, and even the arrests of prominent officials willing to put their bodies on the line. These aren't just numbers; they're individual stories – stories like that of Esdrás, the college student whose future hangs in the balance; Rodney Taylor, the barber who's been a pillar of his community; and Mario Guevara, the journalist now facing deportation. These stories are fueling the rise of the "Abolish ICE" movement, a powerful and polarizing call for dismantling the agency altogether. V. The Legal Minefield: Due Process, Rights, and Controversies Beyond the protests, the legal landscape is a minefield of challenges and controversies. Allegations of "illegal deportations" – cases of US citizens being wrongly detained and deported – raise profound questions about due process and the agency's adherence to the law. Accusations of defying court orders further erode public trust. A recent landmark ruling by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, upholding a ban on detaining individuals based solely on appearance, language, or job, represents a significant blow to the administration's policies.The tactics employed by ICE are also under intense scrutiny: the use of masked agents, arrests at "sensitive locations" like courthouses, and policies that effectively eliminate eligibility for bond hearings, leading to prolonged detention. And then there are the disturbing reports of overcrowding, inadequate medical care, and outright abuse within ICE detention facilities. Even local law enforcement agencies, like the LAPD, are caught in the crossfire, accused of indirectly aiding ICE through data sharing, despite the city's "sanctuary" policies. On the other side, reports of an 830% increase in assaults against ICE officers speak to the rising tensions and the dangers faced by those charged with enforcing these laws. VI. The Road Ahead: Funding, Technology, and Policy Battles The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" has injected billions of dollars into ICE, earmarking funds for hiring more agents and constructing a massive expansion of detention centers. This infusion of resources will undoubtedly fuel further enforcement activities. The agency is also increasingly turning to technology, expanding its use of AI and social media surveillance in its efforts to identify and apprehend those in violation of immigration laws.The legislative arena is also a battleground. At the federal level, we're seeing bills proposing increased transparency for officers, mandatory detention for certain offenses, and an end to the "catch and release" policy. Meanwhile, at the state level, a stark divide has emerged: Republican-led states are pushing for stricter local enforcement, while Democratic-led states are seeking to protect immigrants and limit cooperation with federal agents. Perhaps most significantly, despite the aggressive enforcement policies, public opinion is shifting, with a growing positive view of immigration and increasing support for pathways to citizenship. Will this evolving public sentiment ultimately influence future policy directions? Only time will tell. VII. Conclusion: A Nation Divided, A Future Unwritten The escalating enforcement actions by ICE, the fierce protests they've ignited, the ongoing legal battles challenging their authority, and the evolving public sentiment toward immigration all underscore the complex and contentious state of immigration in America. These intersecting forces will profoundly shape the lives of millions of individuals and redefine the very fabric of our nation. The story of ICE and deportations is far from over; it's a dynamic saga with profound implications for human rights, civil liberties, and the fundamental identity of a nation built by immigrants. It is a story we must continue to watch, to debate, and, ultimately, to write together.

New Deportation Nation: How ICE's Intensified Operations Are Reshaping US Communities Post

The scenes were unmistakable. In Houston, demonstrators locked arms across the courthouse steps, chanting for an end to immigration raids. In San Antonio, church bells rang as parishioners marched alongside migrants carrying signs that read “Families Belong Together.” Washington, D.C., saw thousands gather on the National Mall, while in San Francisco, protesters blocked intersections near the federal building, drawing heavy police presence.What began as a flashpoint in Los Angeles—where federal agents carried out a wave of aggressive Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids—has now become a national movement. Over the past 72 hours, protests have spread to major cities in Texas, the nation’s capital, and across California’s Bay Area. Organizers describe it as a spontaneous eruption against what they call “militarized immigration enforcement.”The Spark in Los Angeles Los Angeles set the stage earlier this week when ICE confirmed more than a hundred arrests tied to coordinated raids across multiple neighborhoods. Federal officials hailed the operation as a “necessary strike” against undocumented residents with prior removal orders. But the optics of heavily armed officers, some wearing masks and lacking identifying badges, galvanized opposition almost immediately.Within hours, demonstrators had gathered outside the Metropolitan Detention Center, chanting late into the night. By the following day, solidarity actions had sprung up in immigrant communities nationwide.A Wave Spreads Outward In Texas, Houston organizers estimated that 3,000 people attended rallies across the city on Wednesday, while San Antonio saw crowds swelling outside City Hall. Washington, D.C., witnessed a convergence of advocacy groups on the Mall, timed to coincide with a congressional recess. In San Francisco, sit‑ins led to more than a dozen arrests after protesters refused to disperse.The demonstrations varied in tone. In some cities, families with children held candlelight vigils. In others, confrontations escalated, with police deploying pepper spray to clear blocked intersections. Still, what united them was a clear demand: halt the raids, end arbitrary detentions, and restore congressional oversight over federal enforcement.The Government’s Position Homeland Security officials have framed the operations as lawful, targeted, and overdue. “We are enforcing existing removal orders and prioritizing public safety,” one DHS spokesperson said, dismissing accusations of indiscriminate sweeps. The administration has emphasized record funding for detention infrastructure, including a new 5,000‑bed expansion in Texas, as evidence of its commitment to border security.But critics argue that the raids reach far beyond dangerous individuals. Civil rights attorneys point to cases involving legal residents, longtime community members, and even recipients of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). “This is not about public safety,” said an attorney with the National Immigration Law Center. “This is about fear and political theater.”Voices from the Ground For those swept into the protests, the motivation is deeply personal. In Houston, Maria R., a U.S. citizen whose husband was detained earlier this month, stood with her two daughters outside a federal courthouse. “My children ask where their father is every night,” she said, her voice breaking. “How do I explain that he is gone because of a broken system?”In Washington, Pastor Luis Velasquez led his congregation in prayer before joining a march past the Capitol. “Our faith demands that we protect the stranger,” he told reporters. “This is about dignity and compassion, not politics.”The Larger Political Stakes The demonstrations come at a time of heightened polarization over immigration policy. With an election season underway, Democrats accuse the administration of inflaming unrest by escalating raids in urban centers. Republicans, by contrast, argue that any attempt to roll back enforcement undermines the rule of law.Beyond partisan lines, however, the protests highlight a more fundamental tension: how far the government can go in pursuit of immigration control before losing public legitimacy. Analysts warn that scenes of children weeping at detention centers, or masked agents arresting longtime residents, could erode faith in institutions.Looking Ahead Activist groups are already planning coordinated actions to coincide with an upcoming military parade in Washington, labeling their campaign the “No Kings” protest. Organizers say it will be one of the largest immigrant rights demonstrations in years.Whether these movements can sustain momentum remains uncertain. Yet the scope of the past week’s protests suggests that immigration raids are no longer isolated law enforcement actions. They are national flashpoints—touching families, stirring congregations, and reshaping political discourse from California to the Capitol.For now, the chants ring out in city after city: “Not one more deportation. Not one more raid.”

A Nation in Protest: Immigration Raids Ignite Demonstrations Coast to Coast

In a development that underscores growing alarm about the state of democracy in the United States, the international civil society alliance CIVICUS has placed America on its global watchlist for attacks on civic freedoms. The announcement, issued on Tuesday, follows months of escalating concerns over mass arrests during peaceful protests, restrictions on journalists, and militarized responses to demonstrations, particularly those targeting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).The designation is rare for a nation that has long portrayed itself as a global beacon of democratic values. By joining countries more commonly associated with authoritarian crackdowns, the U.S. now faces renewed international scrutiny at a moment when domestic political divisions are deepening and civil rights organizations are sounding the alarm.&nbsp; Why CIVICUS Is Watching the U.S. Founded in 1993, CIVICUS tracks the health of civic freedoms worldwide, rating countries on their protection of free expression, peaceful assembly, and press independence. Its July 2025 update singled out the U.S. for what it described as “sustained attacks on civil liberties during the first half of President Trump’s second term.”Among the examples cited:<ul><li>Mass arrests at peaceful protests — Hundreds were detained during demonstrations against immigration raids in Los Angeles and Chicago, often without formal charges.</li><li>Suppression of journalists — Reporters covering ICE raids and immigration enforcement, such as Salvadoran journalist Mario Guevara, have faced detention, deportation threats, or outright denial of access to federal facilities.</li><li>Deployment of military force — Earlier this month, 2,700 National Guard troops were mobilized in Los Angeles, an unusually heavy-handed response to local protests.</li><li>CIVICUS concluded that these measures, taken together, represent a dangerous erosion of the democratic norms that once distinguished the U.S. from countries with weaker protections for civic space.</li></ul>&nbsp; Civil Liberties Under Strain Domestic advocates echo CIVICUS’s concerns. The American Civil Liberties Union has documented an uptick in “dragnet arrests” at rallies, noting that immigrant communities are disproportionately targeted. Advocacy organizations in Texas and California argue that protest activity linked to immigration enforcement has become the latest flashpoint in a broader struggle over free speech.Journalists, too, describe a climate of intimidation. Several local reporters have reported surveillance, sudden ICE holds, or revocation of press credentials after covering raids. Press freedom watchdogs warn that the U.S. now risks falling further in global press freedom rankings, already at their lowest in decades.For many observers, these developments confirm that the country is experiencing a systemic rollback of rights that were once considered untouchable.&nbsp; The Political Fallout International rebukes often resonate differently inside U.S. politics. While immigration advocates and progressive lawmakers argue the CIVICUS designation should serve as a wake‑up call, Trump administration officials dismiss it as “foreign interference.” Bill Essayli, the U.S. Attorney for California’s Central District and a key enforcer of immigration policy, recently described such critiques as “grandstanding by global NGOs that have no jurisdiction over American law.”But the symbolism carries weight. Human rights experts note that the U.S. has often used CIVICUS rankings to pressure other nations, particularly in Latin America and Eastern Europe, to improve protections for activists. Now, with the U.S. itself under scrutiny, critics say Washington has lost credibility as an advocate for human rights abroad.&nbsp; A Question of America’s Standing For decades, American leaders invoked “freedom of speech” and “freedom of assembly” as cornerstones of the nation’s identity. To find itself listed alongside countries with contested democracies is more than a symbolic downgrade—it raises questions about the future of U.S. global influence.“The watchlist designation should shock Americans into recognizing how far their institutions have slipped,” said Lysa John, CIVICUS Secretary General, in a statement. “A democracy is only as strong as its protections for those who dissent. Right now, those protections are crumbling.”&nbsp; What Comes Next In the weeks ahead, CIVICUS will issue a formal review that could escalate America’s status from watchlist to obstructed, a rating typically reserved for countries where activists face systemic harassment. Domestically, legal challenges are mounting, including lawsuits by immigrant rights organizations and civil liberties lawyers seeking injunctions against ICE’s collaboration with local police.Meanwhile, activists across Los Angeles, Houston, and New York are preparing coordinated demonstrations in early August, framing their protests not only as opposition to immigration raids but as defense of American democracy itself.Whether these movements can reverse the trajectory remains uncertain. But one fact is clear: the eyes of the world are now on the United States, watching to see whether it can live up to the democratic ideals it has so long championed—or whether it will continue to erode the freedoms once considered its hallmark.

America on the Watchlist: Global Group Flags U.S. for Attacks on Civil Liberties

On Tuesday, an extraordinary confrontation unfolded in Arizona when Representative Greg Stanton, a Democrat from Phoenix, was turned away at the gates of the Eloy Detention Center, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility. The move, described by Stanton as a direct violation of congressional authority, is sparking a broader debate over transparency, accountability, and the rights of lawmakers to monitor federal detention sites.According to Stanton, he had scheduled the visit to check on the well‑being of a detained constituent and to review conditions inside the center. But when he arrived, ICE officials cited a new agency rule: members of Congress must provide a seven‑day notice before entering. Stanton and his allies argue that this policy is not only arbitrary but directly conflicts with laws that guarantee elected officials immediate access to detention facilities.“This is about accountability,” Stanton said in a statement. “We have a statutory right to enter these facilities at any time. ICE is acting as if it can pick and choose when oversight happens. That’s not acceptable.”&nbsp; Oversight Collides With Enforcement The denial comes at a critical moment. The Trump administration’s aggressive deportation push has resulted in an explosion of detentions across the Southwest. Arizona has become a flashpoint, with advocacy groups documenting cases of overcrowding, limited medical care, and questionable treatment of detainees.Historically, congressional visits—sometimes unannounced—have served as a vital check on conditions in facilities that are otherwise shielded from public view. Democrats now say ICE’s seven‑day rule effectively allows the agency to stage‑manage inspections, potentially masking abuses.Representative Pramila Jayapal of Washington, chair of the House Progressive Caucus, called the restriction “a calculated attempt to avoid scrutiny.” Several House members are exploring legal avenues, including a possible lawsuit, to force ICE to honor immediate access rights enshrined in federal law.&nbsp; A History of Secrecy Eloy Detention Center, operated by the private contractor CoreCivic, has long been criticized by human rights organizations. Reports over the past decade have highlighted high suicide rates, inadequate medical response times, and allegations of excessive force. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has repeatedly sued CoreCivic over conditions at Eloy and other sites.Stanton’s denial of entry is viewed by advocates as another example of the lack of transparency surrounding privately run detention facilities. “When members of Congress are locked out, what chance does the average detained immigrant have for justice?” asked Carlos García, a longtime Phoenix community organizer.&nbsp; The Larger Political Landscape The incident also reflects the deepening rift between the Biden‑era norms of oversight and the Trump administration’s return to enforcement‑first policies. President Trump has pledged to remove more than one million immigrants annually, and ICE is now on pace for its highest deportation totals since 2014. That pressure has placed detention centers under intense strain, amplifying the urgency of congressional oversight.For Arizona—a state with one of the largest immigrant populations in the country—the stakes are particularly high. Families in Phoenix and Tucson have rallied outside detention facilities demanding greater access for attorneys, clergy, and lawmakers. Tuesday night, protesters gathered outside Eloy holding signs reading “Transparency Now” and “Let Congress In.”&nbsp; What Comes Next Stanton and other Democrats are preparing to challenge ICE in court if necessary. Legal experts say the case could set an important precedent: whether federal agencies can unilaterally restrict elected officials from exercising statutory oversight duties.In the meantime, immigrant advocates are urging continued vigilance. “This is not just about one congressman being denied entry,” said Laura Gómez, director of a Tucson‑based immigrant rights nonprofit. “It’s about whether our democracy allows secret prisons to operate without checks and balances.”As legal battles loom, the Eloy standoff underscores the fragile balance between immigration enforcement and constitutional oversight. For now, one fact is certain: the doors of Eloy remain closed, and the fight over who has the right to walk through them is only beginning.

New PosArizona Congressman Denied Access to ICE Detention Center, Raising Oversight Battlet

HOUSTON — On a sweltering afternoon this week, the steps of Houston City Hall became a stage for outrage. Hundreds of demonstrators, led by immigrant rights groups, faith leaders, and families directly affected by deportations, rallied against what they describe as “dangerous entanglements” between the Houston Police Department and Immigration and Customs Enforcement.The protest, organized by United We Dream, Mi Familia Vota, and a coalition of grassroots organizations, was sparked by reports that local police had been detaining parents during routine traffic stops and home calls—only to hand them over to federal agents. Advocates argue this practice is tearing families apart and undermining trust in law enforcement in one of the nation’s most diverse cities.A Community on Edge “This is family separation by another name,” declared Marisol Ramos, an organizer whose own cousin was detained last year after reporting a car break-in. Her words were met with chants of “Not one more! Not one more!” from the crowd, many holding signs with messages like “Stop Collaborating With ICE” and “Keep Families Together.”For immigrant families, the implications reach far beyond arrests. “Parents are afraid to call 911,” said Reverend James Morales, a local pastor who spoke at the rally. “When cooperation between local police and ICE becomes the norm, entire communities go silent. Crimes go unreported. People vanish.”City Leadership Under Pressure Mayor John Whitmire, who has previously emphasized cooperation with federal authorities, now finds himself caught between political pressures and public outrage. While City Hall has yet to issue a formal statement in response to the protest, immigrant advocates are calling for an immediate policy shift—demanding clear restrictions on police interaction with ICE.Houston, home to nearly half a million immigrants, has long been a flashpoint in national immigration debates. Local activists argue that the city is effectively enabling the federal government’s deportation machinery. “We’re not talking about violent criminals,” noted attorney Karla López, who represents several families in detention. “We’re talking about mothers and fathers who are working hard, paying taxes, and raising kids.”The National Context The protest comes at a moment when immigration enforcement is once again dominating headlines across the country. In Arizona, a congressman was denied entry to an ICE facility, sparking questions about oversight. In Florida, a U.S. citizen teenager was reportedly told he had “no rights” by ICE officers. Together, these stories highlight a troubling trend: the erosion of due process and accountability in the name of enforcement.Houston’s demonstration reflects a growing grassroots resistance. “This isn’t just about one city,” said Cristina Jiménez, co-founder of United We Dream. “This is about a national fight to protect immigrant families from abuse, from raids, from the constant threat of deportation.”Voices of the Next Generation Among the most striking moments of the protest were the testimonies of children. Ten-year-old Daniela, holding her mother’s hand, told the crowd: “I’m scared every day that my parents won’t come home.” Her trembling voice captured the heart of the rally, where chants gave way to tears.Speakers reminded officials that Houston has a history of welcoming immigrants, from Vietnamese refugees in the 1970s to asylum seekers arriving today. “Our city thrives because of immigrants,” said Morales. “If we betray that legacy, we betray ourselves.”What Comes Next Organizers have vowed to continue escalating pressure. Plans include a sit‑in outside police headquarters and a petition drive demanding that the Houston City Council adopt a sanctuary‑style policy forbidding collaboration with ICE. While the path forward is uncertain, one thing was made clear in the heat of the Houston protest: immigrant communities are no longer waiting quietly on the sidelines.For many, the rally was not just about policy, but about dignity and survival. As the sun set over City Hall, protesters held a candlelight vigil. “This is a fight for our families,” said Ramos, holding back tears. “And we’re not going anywhere.”

Houston Protesters Demand an End to Police–ICE Cooperation

In Los Angeles, a series of federal prosecutions tied to anti‑ICE demonstrations has collapsed under the weight of its own inconsistencies. In recent weeks, judges quietly dismissed multiple cases after revelations that federal agents had given misleading or outright false testimony. What began as an attempt to make examples of protesters has become a cautionary tale about government overreach, credibility, and the fragile boundary between enforcement and abuse of authority.False Testimony and Embarrassing Dismissals According to court records reviewed by The Guardian and other outlets, Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, along with allied federal officers, made claims under oath that prosecutors could not substantiate. In some instances, defense attorneys demonstrated that the alleged crimes simply did not occur as described. In others, the physical evidence contradicted sworn statements. The Department of Justice, facing mounting pressure and accusations of misconduct, opted to dismiss several cases rather than risk further embarrassment in open court.For the defendants—most of whom were young activists swept up in demonstrations against deportations—the turnaround was dramatic. Only months ago, prosecutors had threatened lengthy prison sentences. Today, many of those same individuals walk free, their records cleared, though not without the lasting scars of arrest, detention, and public vilification.A Pattern of Aggressive Enforcement Legal experts note that this is not an isolated episode. In recent years, the federal government has leaned heavily on immigration enforcement as a means to quell dissent, particularly in cities such as Los Angeles, Portland, and New York. The collapse of these cases, critics argue, reveals a deeper pattern: aggressive charges built on shaky evidence, designed to discourage protest and silence opposition to ICE raids.“The real message here is deterrence,” said one civil rights attorney involved in the cases. “Federal prosecutors wanted to send a signal to anyone who dared challenge ICE in the streets. But when their evidence was scrutinized, it fell apart.”Human Toll on Protesters For those arrested, the legal battles left emotional and financial scars. Some protesters lost jobs while awaiting trial. Others faced family separations and months of uncertainty. One activist, who asked not to be named, described the ordeal as “a punishment without conviction,” saying the process itself was meant to grind people down even if the government could not secure guilty verdicts.The dropped charges offer relief but not restitution. There is little recourse for the time lost, the reputations damaged, or the fear instilled by armed federal officers storming city streets.Wider Implications for Justice and Immigration Policy The unraveling of these cases lands at a politically charged moment. Immigration enforcement remains one of the most polarizing issues in American life, with ICE conducting large‑scale raids, expanding detention facilities, and facing nationwide protests. The federal government’s decision to pursue questionable prosecutions—and then to retreat once their foundation crumbled—raises pressing questions about accountability.What does it mean for a democracy when sworn testimony by federal officers cannot be trusted? How can the public distinguish legitimate law enforcement from politically motivated intimidation? These are not abstract questions. They shape the relationship between immigrant communities, activist networks, and the institutions tasked with enforcing the law.Calls for Oversight and Reform Advocacy groups in California are now calling for an independent review of the prosecutions. Organizations such as the ACLU and immigrant rights coalitions argue that without accountability, there is nothing to stop similar abuses in the future. They point to the need for stronger oversight of ICE, clearer standards for federal testimony, and protection for those exercising their constitutional right to protest.Meanwhile, some lawmakers have begun pressing for hearings. A small group of California representatives have requested a formal inquiry into the conduct of the agents involved. Whether these calls will gain traction in Washington remains uncertain, but the pressure is unlikely to fade.The Broader Narrative The Los Angeles dismissals are part of a larger national narrative: the tension between immigration enforcement and civil liberties. From Portland to El Paso, ICE has been at the center of controversy—not only for its handling of detainees but also for its aggressive posture toward critics. The collapse of these cases underscores the fragility of federal claims when tested against the standard of evidence.It is a reminder that, in the rush to prosecute, the government is not infallible. The courts, flawed as they may be, remain one of the few arenas where truth can be forced into the light.

Federal Cases Against Los Angeles Protesters Collapse Amid False Testimony

Liberaza

An activist apparel label—part protest gear, part community hub, part online shop—built to empower, inform, and unite everyone who believes in defending democracy and human rights.

Daily Post

New Deportation Nation: How ICE's Intensified Operations ...

A Nation in Protest: Immigration Raids Ignite Demonstrati...

America on the Watchlist: Global Group Flags U.S. for Att...

New PosArizona Congressman Denied Access to ICE Detention...

Houston Protesters Demand an End to Police–ICE Cooperation

Federal Cases Against Los Angeles Protesters Collapse Ami...