Blog

HARTFORD, Conn. — Connecticut legislators have joined a growing chorus of voices urging the federal government to ban the use of masks and concealed identification by immigration enforcement agents, citing transparency, public trust, and constitutional protections.At a press conference held Thursday on the Capitol steps, a coalition of state senators and representatives endorsed the proposed “No Masks for ICE” Act, a federal bill currently under review by the House Oversight Committee. The legislation would require all federal immigration agents—particularly those operating in civilian areas—to wear clear visual identification, including full names, agency patches, and badge numbers.“We are seeing deeply concerning tactics used in our communities,” said State Senator Eliza Santos (D-New Haven). “Agents dressed in military gear, with faces covered and names hidden, are detaining people in broad daylight. That’s unacceptable in a democracy.”&nbsp; State and Federal Partnership in Focus Though immigration enforcement is federally controlled, state lawmakers in Connecticut argue they have a responsibility to speak out when practices affect local residents. Several immigrant advocacy groups have shared accounts of masked ICE agents operating in cities such as Bridgeport, Waterbury, and Hartford.“We are not trying to interfere with federal jurisdiction,” said Rep. Jordan Malik (D-Stamford). “But when our constituents are afraid to leave their homes because they don’t know who is knocking at their door, it becomes a state issue, too.”The proposed federal law would standardize enforcement appearance across agencies and prohibit agents from wearing face coverings during civil immigration operations, except in limited circumstances involving imminent physical threats.&nbsp; National Backdrop: ICE Anonymity Under Fire Connecticut’s support comes amid a national reckoning over ICE tactics. Reports from across the country have highlighted an uptick in masked raids, anonymous detentions, and the use of unmarked vehicles to apprehend individuals with pending immigration cases.Civil rights organizations such as the ACLU and the Immigrant Legal Defense Fund have argued that these practices undermine trust and obscure accountability.“People have the right to know who is detaining them and why,” said Kate Williams, a constitutional law expert at the University of Connecticut. “We don’t allow anonymous policing in other contexts. Immigration enforcement should not be the exception.”&nbsp; Legislative Momentum Builds The “No Masks for ICE” bill, first introduced in May, gained renewed momentum following public outcry over recent detentions in Texas and California involving masked agents outside courtrooms and workplaces. Connecticut is now one of six states where lawmakers have voiced formal support.The federal legislation also calls for:<ul><li>Documentation of every enforcement action involving face coverings</li><li>Public reporting requirements on enforcement locations</li><li>Mandatory body cameras during civil detentions</li><li>Supporters argue these measures will not only protect civil liberties but also restore public confidence in immigration agencies currently viewed with suspicion by many communities.</li></ul>&nbsp; Local Impact and Political Alignment Connecticut is home to nearly 500,000 immigrants, including refugees, asylum seekers, and undocumented individuals. Lawmakers say that for many of these residents, fear of ICE has escalated—driven not only by federal policy but also by how enforcement is carried out.“There’s a real difference between being arrested by a uniformed officer with a name badge versus someone in black tactical gear who won’t even say where they’re taking you,” said State Rep. Noor Alvi (D-Hartford). “That’s not law enforcement. That’s intimidation.”&nbsp; Next Steps Connecticut lawmakers say they will continue pushing for reforms both locally and federally. A state-level resolution supporting the federal bill is expected to be introduced in the General Assembly in August.In the meantime, immigrant rights groups are hosting “Know Your Rights” workshops and advising residents to document any encounters with ICE agents, especially those who do not display credentials.As the national debate continues, Connecticut’s stance may help set the tone for other states seeking to balance federal authority with constitutional accountability.

Connecticut Lawmakers Support Federal Push to End Masked ICE Operations

EL PASO, Texas — A Cuban asylum seeker was detained this week by masked Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents just minutes after appearing in a scheduled immigration court hearing, prompting renewed scrutiny over the agency’s enforcement tactics and their impact on due process.The 25-year-old woman, identified by advocates only as Jenny for safety reasons, had just completed a brief procedural hearing at the El Paso immigration court when she was approached outside the courthouse by men in tactical gear. According to legal observers and immigrant rights groups, the agents did not identify themselves verbally or with visible credentials. Jenny was placed in an unmarked vehicle and taken to a nearby detention facility.“She had no criminal record, no outstanding deportation order, and she had complied with all court requirements,” said Maria Ortega, an immigration attorney with the Border Justice Project, who has followed the case. “She was pursuing asylum through legal channels and then was suddenly detained without explanation.”&nbsp; Legal and Procedural Questions Jenny’s arrest has raised serious legal questions. Her attorneys assert that ICE enforcement in or near courthouses undermines the right to due process, particularly when it occurs without notice, warrants, or clear identification.Although ICE guidance in 2021 restricted enforcement actions in “sensitive locations” such as courthouses, churches, and hospitals, the agency has not clarified whether these rules are still being enforced. In this case, no official statement has been released explaining why Jenny was detained, or whether any court orders had been issued.“We’re seeing a breakdown in the basic expectations of transparency,” Ortega added. “People going through the legal process shouldn’t be punished for doing the right thing.”&nbsp; Masked Agents Draw Broader Scrutiny The use of face coverings and anonymity among federal immigration agents has been increasingly controversial in 2025. Recent weeks have seen a growing number of reports involving masked ICE officers operating without visible identification. These tactics have been reported in multiple states and are drawing criticism from both civil liberties groups and elected officials.In Jenny’s case, witnesses described agents wearing black clothing and balaclavas, offering no verbal confirmation of their agency. Her legal team was not informed of the arrest until nearly 24 hours later.“They simply took her,” said Rosa Benítez, a volunteer court observer present that day. “She walked out of the building, and they intercepted her as if she were a fugitive. But she wasn’t. She was in full compliance with the law.”&nbsp; Asylum Process in Flux Jenny had been seeking asylum in the United States since arriving from Cuba last year. According to her attorneys, she fled political persecution and had been attending all scheduled court dates while awaiting her next hearing, which had been set for August 2026.Her case now faces new complications. While technically still in proceedings, her detention could result in expedited removal or the denial of her asylum claim, depending on how ICE processes her case internally.This legal uncertainty is not uncommon. Immigration law allows for broad discretion by enforcement agencies, especially in cases involving recent border arrivals or those deemed “removable.” But advocates argue that such discretion should not override the fundamental protections afforded by asylum law and due process.&nbsp; Policy Debate Intensifies Jenny’s arrest comes amid a growing national conversation about enforcement practices. Members of Congress are currently reviewing legislation that would restrict ICE from using masks during public operations and require all agents to display visible credentials. The bill has gained momentum in recent days, following a string of similar detentions in California, New York, and Arizona.“The optics are concerning,” said Rep. Joaquín Martinez (D-TX). “We cannot allow a situation where someone seeking asylum—someone doing everything by the book—is effectively disappeared by agents acting under a veil of anonymity.”The Department of Homeland Security has yet to respond to inquiries regarding Jenny’s case or the broader practice of post-courtroom detentions.&nbsp; The Personal Toll As of Friday morning, Jenny remains in ICE custody at the El Paso Processing Center. Her attorneys have filed an emergency motion for release and are requesting that her asylum case continue without disruption.“She is scared, confused, and feels betrayed by a system she hoped would protect her,” Ortega said.While her case proceeds, it is likely to serve as a focal point in the broader debate over ICE transparency, immigrant due process, and the boundaries of lawful enforcement.

Masked ICE Agents Detain Cuban Asylum Seeker Outside Texas Courtroom

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A growing number of reports detailing masked federal agents detaining immigrants in unmarked vehicles has caught the attention of Congress, and lawmakers want answers.At the center of the controversy is Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the agency responsible for much of the nation’s interior immigration enforcement. Over the past few months, community groups, attorneys, and immigrants themselves have described increasingly opaque encounters with federal officers—many of whom wore balaclavas or other face coverings, refused to provide names or badge numbers, and operated out of vehicles with no clear markings.Now, members of Congress are pushing back.“We are seeing tactics that belong more in authoritarian states than in the United States of America,” said Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA), who co-authored a letter to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem this week demanding an explanation for the practice.The letter, also signed by Rep. Summer Lee (D-PA) and other progressive lawmakers, asks DHS to clarify when and why ICE agents are allowed to conceal their identities during operations, and whether such practices violate internal policy or federal law. The lawmakers are also calling for public data on how often these masked raids have occurred.&nbsp; Anonymity at the Expense of Accountability For advocates and civil rights attorneys, the concern is not academic.“The moment someone in tactical gear knocks on your door without a badge, without saying who they are, your rights are already at risk,” said Joseline Herrera, a lawyer with the Immigrant Defense Network. “People don’t know if it’s ICE, Homeland Security Investigations, a joint task force—or someone impersonating them. That’s the danger.”Incidents have been reported in multiple states, including California, Texas, and Georgia. In several cases, families said they didn’t know who had detained their loved ones until hours later—sometimes not until they’d already been transferred to detention centers.In Los Angeles, one mother told community organizers she watched from her window as three men in dark clothing forced her nephew into an SUV at dawn. No warrants were shown. No words were exchanged. When she asked if he was being arrested, one of the men simply shook his head and drove off.It wasn’t until two days later that she learned her nephew had been detained by ICE for overstaying his visa.&nbsp; ICE: Safety or Secrecy? ICE officials have defended the use of masks and anonymity during enforcement actions, citing officer safety. In a written statement, the agency said, “Certain enforcement contexts require protective measures, including facial coverings, to shield agents from physical threats, doxing, and targeted violence.”But critics argue the policy—if it is indeed formal policy—has gone too far.“Security shouldn’t come at the cost of due process and civil liberties,” said Rep. Lee in a press briefing. “When federal agents look indistinguishable from armed vigilantes, we’ve lost a critical line between government authority and abuse of power.”The Department of Homeland Security has yet to respond to the congressional letter. DHS Secretary Noem has not issued a public statement on the matter as of Friday morning.&nbsp; Legal and Political Fallout Looming The optics come at a delicate time for the Biden administration. Deportations are rising sharply in 2025—ICE is on track to remove over 300,000 individuals this year, the highest total since 2014. Meanwhile, immigration remains a politically volatile issue as both major parties sharpen their positions ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.For Democrats who have long criticized the agency’s lack of oversight, the masked operations represent a troubling return to the more secretive tactics seen during the Trump era. For Republicans, who have largely avoided comment on the matter, the issue poses a test: how to balance national security messaging with growing unease among Latino and immigrant voters.Legal experts say the issue may soon land in federal court.“There’s a strong constitutional argument to be made here,” said law professor Henry Velez of NYU Law School. “The Fourth and Fifth Amendments require clear identification and purpose when detaining someone. If agents are obscuring their identities, it opens the door to false arrest claims and civil rights lawsuits.”&nbsp; The Human Cost Beyond the policy debates, it’s the psychological toll that resonates most with families on the ground.In Bakersfield, 16-year-old Sofia Ramirez said she hasn’t slept since watching her father get taken away by men she couldn’t identify.“They looked like police but didn’t say anything. I thought it was a robbery,” she said. “I didn’t know they could just come like that.”Her father remains in ICE custody, awaiting a bond hearing.&nbsp; What Comes Next? Congressional hearings are likely in the coming weeks. Lawmakers have already begun circulating draft legislation that would require all federal enforcement personnel to display visible agency affiliation and ID numbers during field operations. The bill, tentatively called the “Federal Transparency in Enforcement Act,” is expected to draw sharp political lines.Until then, communities remain wary. Advocacy groups are urging anyone facing ICE enforcement to record all encounters, request written documentation, and speak with legal counsel before answering any questions.Because in an environment where agents can hide their faces, knowing your rights might be the only thing standing between freedom and disappearance.&nbsp; For updates on this and other immigration enforcement stories, follow #ICEWatch and #CivilRightsNow.

Masked ICE Agents Spark Outrage and Congressional Scrutiny

A U.S. Citizen Targeted—Twice—by ICE Due to System Errors In a deeply troubling repeat of a past mistake, Miguel Silvestre, a U.S. citizen born in Stockton, California, has again been wrongfully flagged for deportation by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Despite having verified his American citizenship over a decade ago, Silvestre was added to ICE’s removal list this June due to what appears to be a systematic failure in immigration data tracking.This is the second time the federal government has wrongly targeted him for deportation. The first occurred in the early 2000s, when he was deported after a routine traffic stop. That mistake was later corrected through legal intervention. But now, nearly two decades later, his name has resurfaced in deportation databases, exposing serious flaws in the way ICE identifies and processes cases.&nbsp; How ICE Flagged a U.S. Citizen—Twice According to reporting by the San Francisco Chronicle, Silvestre’s latest ordeal began in June 2025 when a routine ICE data sweep flagged his name as a “deportable alien.” This happened despite him having official documents proving his birth in the United States, including a valid birth certificate, Social Security card, and legal records confirming his U.S. citizenship status.Legal advocates had helped him resolve his citizenship status after his first wrongful deportation. His name was cleared, his case was closed, and his rights as a U.S. citizen were affirmed. Yet, with no warning, ICE's internal systems triggered a second deportation action, raising urgent concerns over data accuracy, due process, and civil rights protections in U.S. immigration enforcement.&nbsp; Data Errors in ICE Systems Pose Nationwide Risk Silvestre’s case is not isolated. Data errors in federal immigration databases are well documented, and they often result in the detention—or in some cases, deportation—of people who are not subject to removal. A 2022 report by the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Inspector General warned that ICE lacks reliable identity verification systems. The report noted that the agency cannot consistently confirm whether someone is a U.S. citizen before initiating removal proceedings.ICE’s use of automated flagging tools, which scan massive amounts of data across multiple databases, often leads to false positives. These tools rely heavily on outdated, inconsistent, or incomplete records. When that flawed data triggers an alert, ICE agents may act before confirming facts, especially in expedited cases.This is how a U.S. citizen like Miguel Silvestre ends up being wrongly targeted—not once, but twice.&nbsp; Citizenship Verification Should Be Final—But It Isn’t One of the most disturbing aspects of this story is that Silvestre had already gone through the legal process to affirm his citizenship. He had been helped by attorneys from legal aid organizations, including those associated with the Immigrant Legal Resource Center and the ACLU. His documentation had been reviewed and validated. There should have been no doubt.And yet, the same government that recognized him as a citizen is now forcing him to defend that status again.According to immigration attorney Jacinta Torres, the broader danger is clear:“If someone with verified citizenship can be repeatedly targeted for deportation, it proves that no one is safe from data-driven mistakes. The system isn’t just broken—it’s unaccountable.” &nbsp; Real-World Consequences for Wrongful Deportation Flags Silvestre now carries with him what his family calls a “just-in-case bag”—a folder of key documents he can present if questioned again. His experience has shaken his community and added to growing pressure on immigration authorities to reform how deportation decisions are made.Beyond the emotional toll, wrongful deportation threats can cost individuals their jobs, disrupt families, and create lasting fear. Legal experts say that in many cases, people lack the resources to fight back, which can lead to unjust outcomes.And when mistakes are made, there is no formal appeals process for citizens wrongly added to ICE’s systems—only legal action and media pressure can force reversals.&nbsp; The Bigger Picture: Immigration Enforcement Needs Oversight Silvestre’s story highlights the urgent need for reform within ICE and DHS, particularly when it comes to citizenship verification and database accuracy. Advocates are calling for:<ul><li>Mandatory human review of any deportation case involving a potential U.S. citizen</li><li>Improved data integration between federal and state identity systems</li><li>Legal protections for individuals who have been previously wrongfully targeted</li><li>Transparency in ICE operations and flagging procedures</li><li>Until such safeguards are in place, more Americans could find themselves in the same frightening position—forced to prove their own identity to a system that should already know it.</li></ul>&nbsp; Final Thoughts: If It Can Happen to Him… Miguel Silvestre’s story is a cautionary tale about the dangers of relying on flawed immigration databases and automated decision-making in life-altering matters like deportation. His experience shows that even U.S. citizens are not immune from the risks of systemic error.It’s not enough to have a birth certificate. It’s not enough to have a court ruling. When government systems forget who you are, the burden falls unfairly on the individual to correct the mistake.And that is a failure of justice we cannot afford to ignore.&nbsp; Would you like help understanding your rights or accessing legal assistance for immigration issues? Visit immigrationadvocates.org or contact the ACLU’s immigration rights division for support.

U.S. Citizen Mistakenly Flagged for Deportation—Again

In recent months, Californians from Los Angeles to Fresno have reported a disturbing trend: heavily armed federal agents appearing in their neighborhoods, conducting aggressive raids, and detaining immigrants—sometimes without clearly stating who they are or which agency they represent.Are they ICE? Border Patrol? Homeland Security Investigations? Some wear no badges. Others show up in unmarked vehicles. They wear tactical gear. They carry military-style weapons. And they often refuse to answer basic questions like: “What agency are you with?” or “Do you have a warrant?”This confusion is not accidental. It’s part of a growing issue that has turned immigration enforcement into a bureaucratic shell game—one where agencies overlap, accountability blurs, and civil rights hang in the balance.&nbsp; The Confusing Alphabet Soup of Immigration Enforcement At first glance, most people associate immigration enforcement with ICE—Immigration and Customs Enforcement. But ICE is just one slice of the pie.There’s also CBP (Customs and Border Protection), HSI (Homeland Security Investigations), and even agents from the FBI and U.S. Marshals Service who occasionally get pulled into joint task forces. These groups often coordinate, but they also operate independently. And when they enter communities, they don’t always make it clear who’s doing what.That’s a problem.Because when an agent knocks on your door at 6:00 a.m. and doesn’t identify themselves—or claims they don’t need to—it becomes nearly impossible for individuals to assert their rights.&nbsp; “Show Your Papers”—Even If You’re the Government A growing number of Californians are calling for legislative action. One proposed bill now moving through the state assembly would require any federal agent operating in California to wear clear identification—agency name, badge number, and jurisdiction—at all times during public operations.The goal is simple: transparency. If a local police officer is required to identify themselves and explain their purpose, why should a federal immigration agent be exempt?Civil rights organizations like the ACLU and CHIRLA (Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles) support the measure. They’ve documented multiple cases where immigrants—some with legal status—were detained or questioned by unidentified federal agents operating outside their legal authority.&nbsp; Real People. Real Consequences. Take Maria, a legal resident from Bakersfield. Her 17-year-old son was stopped by what appeared to be ICE officers while walking home from his job at a taco truck. The agents didn’t explain who they were. They asked for his ID, searched his backpack, and told him to “watch himself.” No warrant. No probable cause.He wasn't arrested. But he was terrified.The next day, he quit his job.This kind of low-grade intimidation is part of a broader pattern of “soft raids”—where the goal may not be mass arrests, but rather surveillance, data collection, or psychological pressure. It's law enforcement by erosion. And it’s happening in the shadows.&nbsp; Why It’s Happening Now The renewed surge in federal immigration enforcement—particularly in sanctuary states like California—comes amid shifting national policies. While the Biden administration initially scaled back ICE activity, political pressure has swung the pendulum again.In 2025, deportations are on track to exceed 300,000—numbers not seen since the peak years of the Obama era. As part of this effort, the federal government has expanded “task force” operations, which allow agents from multiple agencies to collaborate on enforcement. But these joint operations often dilute responsibility.When a person is detained, who do they file a complaint against? ICE? CBP? HSI? And if no one identified themselves, where does the paper trail begin?This lack of clarity makes legal recourse nearly impossible. Worse, it chills entire communities, silencing those who might otherwise speak out.&nbsp; Civil Liberties vs. Federal Power Supporters of these joint raids argue that immigration violations are federal crimes, and therefore not subject to the same local transparency rules. But critics push back.“When federal agents operate like secret police, democracy begins to rot,” says State Assemblymember Eloise Reyes, who co-sponsored the California ID Act. “No one—no matter their status—should be afraid to open their front door because they don’t know who’s on the other side.”The act would create a digital log of all federal immigration actions in California and mandate reporting requirements whenever a federal agency detains or questions an individual.&nbsp; What Comes Next? This issue is gaining steam. Journalists, watchdog groups, and civil society advocates are all calling for more light and less fog in the immigration enforcement space.Some sheriffs in California have already issued guidance refusing to assist any federal agents who do not clearly identify themselves. Meanwhile, several sanctuary cities are exploring local ordinances that would limit cooperation with unidentified federal personnel.But the federal government isn’t required to play along. ICE and other agencies can—and often do—ignore local policies entirely.That’s why the push for state-level legislation is so critical.&nbsp; Final Thoughts This isn't just a story about undocumented immigrants. It's about government transparency, due process, and the right of every resident—citizen or not—to know who holds power in their communities.Because when agents can act anonymously and without oversight, no one is truly safe. Not Maria. Not her son. Not you.&nbsp; Want to stay informed and take action? Follow #ICEWatch and #TransparencyNow. Share your stories. Demand accountability.And never stop asking: “Who are you—and what gives you the right?”

Who Are These Agents? The Growing Confusion Around Immigration Raids in California

In a quiet corner of Oregon, a growing storm of resistance is taking flight—literally. This week, Eugene-based activists launched a creative and pointed campaign against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), dubbed “ICE Air to Fly Away.” The initiative, named with biting irony after the agency’s notorious air transport operations, is the latest act of defiance in a city known for its activist roots.What began as a modest protest has become a coordinated effort across community spaces and social media platforms. The message is simple but resonant: No more secret flights. No more silent deportations. No more vanishing neighbors.Taking on the Wings of Injustice The name “ICE Air” isn’t new. It’s long been the colloquial label for the U.S. government’s fleet of contracted planes used to deport thousands of immigrants every year. These flights, often shrouded in secrecy, remove individuals—sometimes without adequate legal recourse—from their communities, jobs, and families.Activists in Eugene are calling out this quiet machinery of deportation with a visibility campaign designed to interrupt that silence. Posters have begun appearing in local libraries, coffee shops, and university bulletin boards. Each poster features bold graphic art, statistics on deportation trends, and a QR code linking to resources on how to resist collaboration with ICE, report raids, and support affected families.Resistance by Design What sets this campaign apart is its playful but powerful use of language and imagery. "ICE Air to Fly Away" evokes the tone of a budget airline ad—only here, the destination is forced exile. It’s a strategy that feels distinctly modern: emotional clarity meets design-savvy activism. One image features a retro airline boarding pass stamped “Deported: Against My Will.” Another mimics a flight map showing departure cities across the U.S. and destinations in Central America, with the caption: You won’t find this flight on Expedia.It’s agitprop for the digital age—shareable, poignant, and impossible to ignore.Behind the Campaign: A Community on Alert Local organizers say the campaign was sparked by reports of increased ICE activity in Oregon and neighboring states. Though Oregon remains a sanctuary state, that hasn’t stopped federal agents from conducting enforcement actions in parking lots, courthouses, or—most troubling—cooperating with commercial airlines for deportation transfers. One organizer, who requested anonymity, said:“People assume deportations only happen in border states or big cities. But the truth is, Eugene has been quietly complicit. ‘ICE Air to Fly Away’ is a way of saying: we see you, and we won’t be silent anymore.” The campaign also includes know-your-rights workshops, pop-up art installations, and a coordinated digital media push using hashtags like #ICEAir, #FlyAwayNoMore, and #DeportationWatch.Why It Matters Now This local story has national implications. According to recent reports, ICE is on track to surpass 300,000 deportations this year—making 2025 one of the most aggressive enforcement years since the Obama administration. With the increase in deportation flights, campaigns like Eugene’s serve as an important reminder: resistance doesn’t always start in the headlines. Sometimes it starts with a flyer in a coffeeshop.This campaign is also a case study in how art and advocacy intersect, turning complex policy critique into bold, emotional narratives that resonate far beyond the activist core.Want to Help? If you’re inspired by what’s taking off in Eugene, here are a few actions you can take:<ul><li>Share campaign art on social media using #ICEAir and #AbolishICE.</li><li>Host a workshop in your own community to educate neighbors on their rights.</li><li>Donate to deportation defense funds or local sanctuary organizations.</li><li>Pressure local leaders to cut ties with ICE and refuse cooperation with deportation requests. &nbsp; ICE may have planes. But we have people—and people don’t fly away quietly.</li></ul>

ICE Air to Fly Away: Grassroots Resistance Gains Altitude in Eugene

Liberaza

An activist apparel label—part protest gear, part community hub, part online shop—built to empower, inform, and unite everyone who believes in defending democracy and human rights.

Daily Post

Connecticut Lawmakers Support Federal Push to End Masked ...

Masked ICE Agents Detain Cuban Asylum Seeker Outside Texa...

Masked ICE Agents Spark Outrage and Congressional Scrutiny

U.S. Citizen Mistakenly Flagged for Deportation—Again

Who Are These Agents? The Growing Confusion Around Immigr...

ICE Air to Fly Away: Grassroots Resistance Gains Altitude...